The digit ratio is the ratio of the lengths of different digits or fingers typically measured from the midpoint of bottom crease where the finger joins the hand to the tip of the finger.
There are also studies that suggest that the 2D: A longer index finger will result in a ratio higher than 1, while a longer ring finger will result in a ratio lower than 1. A number of studies have shown a correlation between the 2D: That a greater proportion of men have shorter index fingers than ring fingers than do women was noted in the scientific literature several times through the late s,   with the statistically significant sex difference in a sample of men and women established by after which time the sex difference appears to have been largely forgotten or ignored.
In Dr Glenn Wilson of King's College, Londonpublished a study examining the correlation between assertiveness in Ring finger length homosexuality in christianity and their digit ratio. Manning and colleagues reported the sex difference in digit ratios was present in two-year-old children  and further developed the
Ring finger length homosexuality in christianity that the index was a marker of prenatal sex hormones.
Since then research on the topic has burgeoned around the world. A study in Biology Letters argues: A paper by Zhengui Zheng and Martin J. Cohn reports "the 2D: A major problem Ring finger length homosexuality in christianity the research on this topic comes from the contradiction in the literature as to whether the testosterone level in adults can be predicted by the 2D: From a study of males and females at the University of Alberta: From a study on a final sample of graduate and undergraduate students from Warwick University proportionally balanced by gender:.
Women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia CAHwhich results in elevated androgen levels before birth, have lower, more masculinized 2D: Males with CAH have more masculine smaller digit ratios than control males,   which also suggests that prenatal androgens affect digit ratios, since amniocentesis samples show that prenatal levels of testosterone are in the high normal range in males with CAH, while levels of the weaker androgen androstenedione are several fold higher than in control males.
A greater digit ratio occurs for men with Klinefelter's syndromewho have reduced testosterone secretion throughout life compared to control males, than in their fathers or control males. In a non-clinical sample of women, digit ratio correlated with anogenital distance in the expected direction. In other words, women with a greater anogenital distance, indicating greater prenatal androgen exposure, had a smaller digit ratio.
Digit ratio in men correlates with genetic variation in the androgen receptor gene. There are reports of a failure to replicate this finding. Thus, it is not clear that 2D: XY individuals with androgen insensitivity syndrome AIS due to a dysfunctional gene for the androgen receptor present as women and have feminine digit ratios on average, as would be predicted if androgenic hormones affect digit ratios.
This finding also demonstrates that the sex difference in digit ratios is unrelated to the Y chromosome per se. The sex difference in 2D: The ratio of testosterone to estradiol measured in 33 amniocentesis samples correlates with the child's subsequent 2D: In pheasantsthe ratio of the 2nd to 4th digit of the foot has been shown to be influenced by manipulations of testosterone in the egg.
Studies in mice indicate that prenatal androgen acts primarily by promoting growth of the fourth digit. There is evidence that this reflects fetal exposure to the hormone testosterone. Several studies present evidence that digit ratios are heritable. The level of estrogen in the amniotic fluid is not correlated with higher 2D: It is not clear why digit ratio is influenced by prenatal hormones.
There is evidence of other similar traits, e. Hox genes responsible for both digit and penis development  have been implicated in affecting these multiple traits pleiotropy. Direct effects of sex hormones on bone growth might be responsible, either by regulation of Hox genes in digit development or independently of such genes. Likewise, it is unclear why digit ratio on the right hand should be more responsive than that on the left hand, as is indicated by the greater sex difference on the right than the left.
One study on mice from suggests that the 2D: Inactivation of AR decreases growth of digit 4, which causes a higher 2D: Manning and colleagues have shown that 2D: It should be noted, Ring finger length homosexuality in christianity, that the standard deviations associated with each given 2D: For example, the ratio for Han children 0.
Thus some ethnic groups' confidence intervals overlap. A study by Lu et al. In Manning et al.
Ring finger length homosexuality in christianity studies explored the question of whether geographical differences in 2D: The conclusions were that geographical differences in 2D: Consanguinous parentage inbreeding has been found to lower the 2D: Some authors suggest that "Ring finger length homosexuality in christianity" ratio correlates with health, behavior, and even sexuality in later life.
Below is a non-exhaustive list of some traits that have been either demonstrated or suggested to correlate with either high or low digit ratio. A study in Germany has found a correlation between digit ratio and male-to-female transgenderism. Trans women were found to have a higher digit ratio than males.
This was not true for trans men, however, who were within the average range for biological females. There is some evidence that 2D: Prenatal sex steroid ratios in terms of 2D: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Not to be confused with Benford's law about the frequencies of leading digits of numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. New data and a meta-analytic review".
American Journal of Human Biology. Influences of prenatal testosterone and maternal environment". A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health. Evidence for alternative mating strategy phenotypes in both men and women". Personality and Individual Differences. The rise of 2D: American Journal of Physical Anthropology.